MEMBERS
Bill Scovell (present)
Fritz Behring (absent)
Randy Brewer (absent)
Richard Fernandez (present)
Ken Hoblick (absent)
Elizabeth Layton (present)
Beth McGee (absent)
Tom McClelland (absent)
Steven Provost (present)
CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
The meeting was called to order by Chair Bill Scovell at 6:05
p.m. with the above attendance noted. Also in attendance were Cindy Finney, County
Managers Office, Dan Eckert, County Attorney, Gloria Marwick, Volusia County Water
and Utilities and Tom Carey, Environmental Management.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JANUARY 10,
2002 MEETING
Elizabeth Layton made a motion that the minutes be accepted.
Richard Fernandez seconded the motion. The motion was passed 7-0 and the minutes were
adopted as written.
GUEST SPEAKER: JACOB VARN,
CONSULTANT WITH VOLUSIAN WATER ALLIANCE
Mr. Scovell introduced Jacob Varn, who was hired by the Volusian Water Alliance
(VWA) to perform an Implementation Strategy Alternatives Evaluation. Mr. Varn said he and
his law partner, Linda Shelley, have been meeting with people to develop a series of
options. They still have quite a few people to talk to and will meet with the VWA
Technical and Managers Advisory Committees on Feb. 15. He gave the Commissioners copies of
a memo sent to VWA Board members (attached) with a series of questions. The questions were
phrased as neutrally as possible but with the goal of trying to determine what people's
aspirations and ideals are, Mr. Varn said. This process is about what local people want.
His job is to listen and facilitate. Three things are necessary: trust - - with 16 local
governments there has to be an element of trust or cooperation; funding and leadership - -
someone must say this is the right thing to do.
Mr. Varn said he hoped people would come to the meeting and
start thinking, relative to water, do you want to develop new sources of water outside of
Volusia County. He would like to see goals established. Another fundamental question is if
water sources are developed, should the water be available for cost or profit?
Having talked to some local governments, some said they have all the water they need and
their community is not growing. His question to them is will it always be that way? Are
they sure their current water supply will be there 20-30 years from now? Mr. Varn said his
experience has been there are no guarantees. The City of Tampa is an example of this kind
of thinking, he said. A discussion ensued on Tampa's problems with water supply.
What needs to be done is to make enough water for
everybody, he said. Then you dont have to argue about the size of the "water
pie." It will be large enough for everybody. The real argument is how much water is
going to cost. We will be more constructive if we make the "pie" bigger instead
of fighting over the size of the pieces.
Mr. Scovell asked about blended rates in Tampa. Mr. Varn
said Tampa went though a series of steps to get where it is today. The Legislature gave
the city its solution. He said Volusia County is ahead of the curve and can still decide
its own fate. Can we weave what people are saying together and set common goals? In Tampa
they agreed to have a unitary rate, with everyone charged the same for water. This solved
a lot of problems.
Most local governments make money from their water and
should be helped to continue to do so, Mr. Varn said.
A discussion ensued on question 3, "If new water
sources are developed, to whom will the water be available (local governments, private
utilities, private customers)?" A discussion ensued. More water can be obtained out
of a total system collectively than by managing it individually, he said. Question 4,
"If new water sources are developed, should it be provided raw to its customers or
treated?" He suggested groundwater be distributed raw so customers can treat it how
they want. River water must be treated.
Question 5, "What is the best way to develop new water
sources? Through existing local government or a new entity?" Do we ask the water
management district to do it? The answer is no, he said. There is a conflict between
people who regulate the water and who are in the supply business.
Question 6, "If a new entity is created, should it
develop only new water sources or purchase existing water supply sources?" A unitary
rate puts everyone in the same boat and allows the cost to be spread over a bigger base.
It is easier financially, he said.
Mr. Scovell asked if there was a possibility the water
management district would dedicate part of its tax revenue to this project? Mr. Varn said
he hoped it would happen. A discussion ensued.
Tom McClelland said some have resisted attempts by this
Commission or its predecessors to move directly to suggesting an authority or something of
that nature. Some felt the WVA was moving forward and eventually would evolve into
something that could manage all the water in Volusia County. However, now people are
backing out of the VWA and there seems a potential for it to fall apart. It makes the task
of creating an entity to respond to some of these questions difficult. We will have to go
back and rebuild so that we have 16 local governments sitting at the same table, he said
Mr. Varn said he believes sooner or later all parties will
be at the same table. He said he intends to identify a series of realistic options that
are available for the County. The question is, where do locals want to go with it? Can we
fashion something they are comfortable with, something that is not a threat to the way
they do business? He said he hoped we can get a common vision of what we want to do.
Getting people to unify so they are not competing with each other is a key element to
this.
Mr. Varn said he does not have an agenda and will do what
the local folks want to do. He said he thinks he may be able to help the community by
framing the question. He provided his telephone number and e-mail address and asked
Commission members to call him with any input and questions.
NEW BUSINESS
Mr. Scovell presented the Commission with a proposal of an advisory ballot for the
November 2002 elections (attached). He said he believed the Commission had reached
consensus on the four issues in the proposal. If residents approve of the proposal in an
election, then political leaders will have to listen, he said.
ADJOURN/SET NEXT MEETING
DATE
There being no further business, the Commission adjourned at 7:47 p.m. The next
meeting of the Commission will be at 6 p.m., Thursday, March 14, 2002 in the Training
Rooms, Thomas C. Kelly Administration Center, DeLand.
back to county council home
page